Re: delay chips and design

[sine@zerocrossing.net]

There is a trim feature that can be useful, but if you're looking for a 
perfect
sine wave, my advise would be to get a nice synth and tape one of it's keys
down.

Mark Sottilaro

Lance Chance wrote:

> don't get me wrong, i love my repeater and what it exclusively offers in 
>the
> way of sync functions and "on-the-fly" waveform editing.  my EDP just 
>seems
> to have this seamless quality to it, and i'm convinced that there has to 
>be
> some method of identifying which machine will be strong at which function
> depending on what method is used to create the over all effect (delay).
> is the EDP a "zero-crossing adjusted" loop machine, as opposed to the
> repeater which is, i assume, a "cross-fade style" machine like the method
> mentioned by Dennis in his post?
> i sort of assumed that the cross fade was responsible for the
> inconsistencies in the sine on the repeater.   is there any way to adjust
> the crossfade so that "dip" is not as apparent, i didn't see anything in 
>the
> manual about it, and i did look a little.  understand that i use a
> consistent sine here as an ideal goal, but actually, my input is more
> dynamic and multitembral than that.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Sottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:08 AM
> Subject: Re: delay chips and design
>
> > There is no pop at the loop point in the Repeater, but a slight "dip"
> > in the audio level, probably the sound of the cross fade working.  Much
> > better than the "click" of the JamMan IMO.
> >
> > Mark Sottilaro
> >
> > On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Dennis Leas wrote:
> > > I suspect the Repeater's designers (who are really bright folks) just
> > > needed
> > > to tweak things a bit to eliminate the "pop."  Unfortunately, time 
>ran
> > > out.
> > >
> > >
> > > Dennis Leas
> > > -------------------
> > > dennis@mail.worldserver.com
> > >
> > >
> >