Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I believe there was also a Vortex patch that would do the same thing (allow you to control the delay input via control pedal). TravisH On 11/25/05, goddard.duncan@mtvne.com <goddard.duncan@mtvne.com> wrote: > > > >>Has anyone out there tried this with an EDP, Repeater DL4, etc?<< > > yes- in fact, I posted to that effect a long time back. I used a dl4 & > volume pedal in order to create some attackless sounds from a keyboard I >was > sampling. the dl4 was on one of it's cleaner settings- probably the >digital > delay with no modulation, & with the repeats turned up so as to sustain >for > a long time. then I "bowed" the keyboard into it using the volume pedal > (gently fading it back out when the repeat came around) & filled up the > delay time, before pressing "go" on the sampler. > > I found that if you carry on filling the delay up (i.e. "overdub" your >first > pass) without letting things get out of hand, it effectively removes >many, > but not all, of the quirks & characteristics of the original sound that > would make it hard to loop in a sampler (especially for keyboard >playback- > there's nothing worse that a warble or something that only reveals itself > when you stray from the "root" note you sampled). you get a nice thick > sample too, without too much chorussing happening (another sampler > giveaway). > > as a musical effect in it's own right, it's something that the /original/ > jamman (we have to write that every time now, yes?) does very well in >it's > echo mode, on 15 or 16. > > with sustained sounds into the repeater, one is almost obliged to do > something like this because of the bump. the repeater reminds me of the >wem > copycat in this respect.... :-) > > how many of us use the repeater as a long delay sometimes? i.e. turn the > overdub down or even off, & use a mixer to control the feedback. it's >quite > good. if you make the first loop a silent one & then start building >things > up, there's no bump either. > > duncan.