Re: Do I need that EDP?

[mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>]

This is exactly why my setup no longer uses a
traditional guitar amp.  In the grand scheme of things
it's just easier to use an amp modeler and put the
looper in the effects loop of the mixer.  Works like a
charm.  I recommend the Vox.

If you can find one, Johnson (Digitech) made some
killer amps that featured stereo effects loops that
also work nicely for such things.  I've got one of the
pure digital ones and I have to admit it sounds pretty
damn good.

Mark

--- Fluke <fluke@gotadsl.co.uk> wrote:

> Seems crazy to me to even think about puting any
> significant amount of
> processing between guitar and preamp. A wah pedal
> and maybe an EQ is as much
> as I can contemplate there. I've been playing over
> 20 years, and have used
> racked processors of one sort or another for most of
> that time, but it is
> natural to me that any time-based processor shoudl
> be fd a signal that is as
> complete as possible.
> 
> Nik
> 
> --------- Original Message --------
> From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> To: "Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com"
> <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Subject: Re: Do I need that EDP?
> Date: 01/03/06 22:20
> 
> 
> I wonder if ideally the best way isn't to mike the
> amp and loop that. It
> varies depending, I think. But I completely agree
> with you that it's a
> conundrum trying to incorporate the sound of the amp
> itself since it's the
> last part of the chain. Any arrangement is going to
> compromise something
> 
> ________________________________________________
> Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com