Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Mac: bootcamp

Title: OT:Mac: bootcamp

If there’s a piece of software that you know isn’t available that you absolutely must have, then yes, boot camp will be anywhere from 10-20% more efficient from a CPU standpoint than parallels.  Latency to other hardware (audio) isn’t typically affected that badly, but there’s some.   I would venture to guess however that 99.9% of the software you’re thinking of either is already available on OSX, or has a near copy from some other vendor or OSS provider.  What do you often use in PC land?  All of the office productivity stuff (again 99%) is available, and usually better in OSX land.

-miles

 

From: Veda, Qua [mailto:qua.veda@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:11 PM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: OT:Mac: bootcamp

 

For best performance with music applications running on a new MacBook ,  would it be better to use "bootcamp" to create a dual booting environment, and put music applications in the Mac side and personal/business on the Windows side?

Or can email, web browsing, personal finance, power point etc  co-exist in the MacOS enviroment (via emulation)  without causing peformance problems for the music applications, latency ,etc

thanks
-Qua