Re: Great speech video on "Sound"

[andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>]

>     Per Boysen wrote:
> 
>          even if no one understands a piece of art
>         it still is art.
 andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk <mailto:akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>> 
wrote:> 
>     give an example

mark francombe wrote:
> ha ha.. surely almost any piece of Art is not truly understandable... at 
> least not in a complete transference of meaning from the Artist to the 
> Viewer.

:-)
yep, just got into Jan Svankmajer.


mark francombe wrote:
> Art is when the Artist deems it to be thus... that is it! 

is it necessary for the artist to understand it?