] [Thread Prev
Re: wikipedia page on livelooping Need Secondary Sources!
If you want a site that looks just like Wikipedia but with lower
notability standards, check out Encyc.
They don't even have articles about most topics ... yet. Sign up, future
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:09:48 +0000, andy butler wrote:
>On 24/03/2014 22:01, Mike wrote:
>>zippypong I believe. I probably won't be doing much additional editing
>>just too much to do with Boomerang and a bunch of gigs I've come into
>>last few months.
>Yes, it seems a bit of a lost cause.
>Once someone's decided a page isn't up to WP standard and is willing to
>delete the existing info rather than improve it there's not a lot to be
>That whole academic business of referencing "reliable" sources while
>logical analysis doesn't really appeal.
>Basically to prove that live looping is "notable" I'd simply quote sales
>figures for the hardware/software, I'm not interested in quoting someone's
>blog about an article in Wire ;-)