Support |
Andre said: >Well, folks, it's time for me to pull my foot out of my mouth, I think. >Thanks *very* much to those of you who have responded with the test on the >Plex; everyone has indicated the same basic "problem" with note decay. > >So it seems tht I had, in fact, not noticed this ideosyncrasy until now. >At least I know the thing's in proper functioning order. Good to see you're feeling a bit better, Andre. Glad we could help! Sorry about the decay problem, we'll try to create some new functions to make that easier to deal with on a future software version. For now, its a design tradeoff that we have to live with for a while. Funny thing here is, if you look for the decay cutoff you can find it, but you are the first person to actually bring it up that I know of. I guess in most people's applications, it doesn't come up. Tells me the design choice was right, although we'll see if we can come up with a way to improve it. Matthias: >> Lets not charge the list too much with such stuff, please. > >For the most part I agree wholeheartedly; let me again apologize for >taking up quite a bit of bandwidth with what has proved to be a >non-existent problem, particularly to Kim, whose correct diagnosis I >erroneously doubted. (At least he can glean some comic relief from the >panic-striken voice on his answering machine...) You gave me a g-wiz flashback, but that's ok.... >Nonetheless, I *do* think that the list should be able to accomodate >emergencies such as this, i.e. problems with the potential to cause >series hassle for impending gigs/projects/etc. God knows where I'd have >been without y'all to provide some much-needed assistance. Given that >we're all using fringe technology that's still in the embryonic stages of >evolution, I think one of the advantages of a list such as this is to >provide technical support. > I agree with Andre....this can be a useful tool to help people out of a difficult situation in a short amount of time. The tradeoff, of course, is that in a public forum you will undoubtedly have people only glancing at things. They see the initially outraged/paniced description of a problem, but maybe miss the resolution. They then wind up with opinions that the item in question may not totally deserve, or are out of proportion with the real situation. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com