Support |
>> additive/resynthesis techniques being developed at cnmat. Naturally, it >> used the ZIPI network/musical desciption language protocol that we were >> also developing. > >ZIPI sounded like something with a lot of potential. What a shame it >will probably never see the light of day. > >> Personally, I hate guitar synthesizers. It's fun for two minutes while I >> play a note and say "golly, it comes out sounding like a digiridoo!" But >> then I notice myself getting bored and losing interest. The problem is >that >> no matter how I play the note, the digiridoo, or tamborine, or whatever, >> sounds EXACTLY the same. All of the expressive techniques I've spent my >> whole life learning to do on guitar strings are totally filtered out. No >> thanks. The infinity was to actually use all the expressive control of >the >> guitarist to control the synthesis, which I found quite exciting. > >The only product I know of that fits that description today (access to >cool non-guitar-like sounds yet with allowance for expressive guitar >techniques) is the Roland VG8. It's a shame there really isn't a >competing >product. The folks on the Digital Guitar list said that while the VG8 >lives up to the hype as far as being responsive to expressive techniques, >they found it somewhat lacking in programmability. > >Since most of the synthesizer sounds that have caught my interest can be >duplicated by guitars equipped with today's signal processing technology >(effects, volume pedals, breath controllers, Ebow, looping devices, etc.) >I'd probably be more interested in getting a good sampler than a >synthesizer, >mainly for cataloging percussion and guitar noises for cut-and-paste. > > >Paolo Valladolid I've been using the GR1 for a couple of years and I certainly find it wanting. Since I also use an Akai S1000 sampler, I am using it more the anything in the GR1 system ... it ends up being an expensive trigger. I agree that the sounds treated with guitar effects etc. and samplers are more agreeable. The guitar as a data entry device into synthesis modules is a good idea in concept as long as we are willing to play according to the inherent limitations of the devices. I have problems with that however ... would rather shape technique and have devices add rather than subtract from it. Oh well Paul