Support |
Actually, Terry Riley composed "In C". TritoneDW wrote: > <<Anyway! I needed to point out something about Philip Glass' music with > respect to looping. The only looping is from the compositional >standpoint, > and not because of any technology. To see an orchestra play his work is > something else, I imagine - the Ensemble alone looked like they shed >quite a > lot of sweat at the Kitchen, Mr.. Glass playing keyboards also, and > conducting using accentuated nods of his head, which sported a bushy >cloud > of hair (then). They were playing it all, man. However, it Wasn't IMHO > 'looping' as most of us on this list know it. More like a compositional > 'repeat', but then I know not much of music composition in the > parochial-classical sense. :) Anyone? Is 'repeat' the correct musical > term? I *know* it's not 'loop'. :)>> > > Ok, I'm sure I'm not the only "classically" trained musician here, but >I'm the > one who checked my e-mail three times today, so I guess I get first >crack at > the official explanation of all this stuff. Mr. Glass is what's called a > Minimalist composer. Other famous Minimalists are Steve Reich (composed > "Electric Counterpoint", performed by Pat Metheney) and John Adams >(composed > "The Death of Klinghoffer", and "Nixon in China", as well as the >Minimalist > landmark "In C"). > > The basic idea of Minimalism in music is to compose peices with a minimal > amount of motivic material--just a couple little ideas, or hooks. The >interest > from the piece comes from the very gradual and subtle change introduced >to the > piece over time. (Make no mistake--these pieces are composed, there is no > improvisation involved.) Glass, for example, tends to create change in >his > pieces through additive and subtractive processes--adding a note to a >motive, > or taking one away. (If this idea doesn't make sense in print, just >listen to > his music--you'll know what I mean.) Listening to these pieces is very >much > like watching clouds move across the sky, in a good way. > > Minimalism, by it's very nature, involves a LOT of repetition >(repetition is > certainly a viable term here). In this way it is sort of like looping. > Certainly people who can listen to looped music and think it's >interesting > would probably relate to Minimalist work, at least on some level. > > The movies Koyaanisqatsi and Powaqatsi (I'm pretty sure on the spelling >of the > two) are excellent introductions to the work of Philip Glass, as there >are > really stunning visual accompaniments to the music. Other pieces to >check out > would be "In C" by John Adams (a piece in which several players play >different > little fragments of music in the key of C), and "Piano Phase" by Steve >Reich. > "Piano Phase" is pretty cool. Basically, two pianists play the same 12 >note > repeated pattern, starting in unison. One player then speeds up ever-so- > slightly, until their pattern has shifted one note ahead of the other > player's. This goes on until the faster player has come all the way >around the > pattern to play in unison again. You can imagine that it's pretty hard >for the > "steady" player to keep an even tempo. Anyway, the piece takes around >twenty > minutes to play all the way through, and it's really cool. When played >well, > you can hear all these crazy sub-patterns and cross rhythms in the "in > between" parts. I've been trying to play it on guitar, with the old >JamPig > playing the steady, but the pattern is a bit un-guitaristic (poor me! >I'll > have to practice...). > > Drew W.