Support |
I mostly agree with what you say here. I was hoping to get us all thinking critically about what in Art would probably be called Critical Theory. Conferring issues with value based on the new ideas they contain. So who has been creating new ideas with looping? Who is expanding the looping genre? Who has been adding new twists to what has been done? It's not the amount of technology used - we all agree on that I suspect. But without a certain aspect of technology none of this would be possible. If it's the Dance Scene where real innovation is taking place, maybe we ought to advertise the existence of our loopy-list to a few dance and dj oriented web-worlds?? David -----Original Message----- From: Kim Flint [SMTP:kflint@chromatic.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 1998 6:58 PM To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com; 'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com' Subject: RE: Who's on the forefront of loopmuse? At 03:50 PM 2/3/98 -0500, John Price wrote: >Gosh darn it! Im feelin awful chatty today. > >The forefront of Looping today is on what most here would undoubtedly consider the lowbrow side of all things loop that is if you are prone to categorizing things. > >IMHO - It's the dance floor dude that is still driving things loopey for the majority of the world - Musicians and audiences included. I tend to agree with this, although it's not always so lowbrow as you might think. A lot of that is a bit of a pose, and often times the people behind it are very sophisticated musicians. The possibilities for innovation and creativity are huge, and a lot of talented people have moved in that direction to take advantage of it. Andre did a nice job of commenting on that, no need for me to add anything there. The dance/electronic/hip-hop/etc. scene is definitely where I see all the innovation in looping as a method, as a process, as a tool, as a type of music. I see people there constantly pushing to evolve things and do something different, move it to the next level. The musicians, the audience, the dj's, and the press all seem to support and encourage that, it's ingrained in the scene in an interesting and healthy way. Loop concepts grow by leaps and bounds there. Another spot of innovation would be the solo instrumentalists, integrating loops into compositions and performances in interesting new ways, expanding their reach. I think you see that here in the many people looping with fingerstyle guitar, or cello, or voice. Probably there are innovative things happening in the academic/high-brow world, but I just don't follow that enough to know. Where I don't see much innovation with looping is in the droney guitar loop scene, the stuff often associated with Fripp. The music may continue to be vital and interesting, but the use of loops is pretty stagnant and complacent. Sorry, but I just don't see anyone pushing the looping process anywhere in that scene. (although it's possible that I just go so bored with it I stopped paying attention.) For me as a developer of loop devices, it is definitely the dance producers who are driving things. They are the ones forcing the innovation in tools and driving us with a constant flow of ideas. Trying to understand, meet, and anticipate their needs so that a looping device might be an effective instrument in that world is a very tough challenge! And the possibilities are so huge and fresh, along with the sheer volume of creativity, that the challenge is really quite exciting and fun. You really get the feeling that when a new feature is introduced, someone will jump on it and do something remarkable. With the droney guitar loop crowd, most of the push is to get one box that does all the things that different boxes available 10-20 years ago did. And that's certainly reasonable, but it's not exactly breaking new ground. You give them something new and they barely notice, maybe getting around to it after a few years. (and in 15 years they will just be demanding that feature in any new device!) anyway, that's my take. kim >Obvious and overexposed Loop Leaders: Beck, Square Pusher, DJ's Spookey & Shadow (Spelling??) Photek, Puff Daddy ( He aint original and he sure don't drone. But his loops are in the hands and ears of eager children all across the world while their $ is secure in his bank account) and The Orb on the Higher end of low end. > >Frankly, I can't nor would I ever dare say that any artist is better than the other. Its always like a pissing contest. And I cant stand it when people turn music appreciation into a sport and forum for their own biases and need to be acknowledged. Just a premonition of how people will respond to DK's question. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: David Kirkdorffer [SMTP:DKirkdorffer@exapps.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 1998 1:02 PM >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: Who's on the forefront of loopmuse? > >I'll try this again, just to see if this gets picked up. > >*So, just for giggles, what / who is on the forefront of "looping-based >music"?* >I know this is somewhat an impossible question, but, maybe it's worth >bashing around for a while. > >David Kirkdorffer > >Attachment Converted: C:\Program Files\Eudora\Attach\RE Who's on the forefront of l > _______________________________________________________ Kim Flint 408-752-9284 Mpact Systems Engineering kflint@chromatic.com Chromatic Research http://www.chromatic.com