Support |
Actually, for the email that you respnded to, I edited out quite a lot. I do try to be considerate. And brief. Though, if something does have to be lengthy, I try to break things up with enough "white space" to make it easier to read. Reg > >1/ Then kindly delete those portions to which your comments are not >addressed. One problem with this list, and the reason digest subscribers > >sometimes get several copies in a day, is that people don't EDIT!! If I'd > >wanted that I'd have gone for the other version. A handy feature of these > >modern computers is that unwanted text can be DELETED, thereby saving not > >only that nebulous entity known as BANDWIDTH, but also the need to scroll > >through seemingly endless lines of dross. Since Kim is kind enough to >keep this list unmoderated (of which, having as I do an anarchist bent, I > >heartily approve) then it is up to us to keep it readable. I prefer my >looping in the audio domain; in text it becomes more redundant than the >base track for "Healthy Colours." > >2/ Then Peter Ensign commented: > >i dont want this shit > >Fine. Then don't read it! Especially, DON'T SEND IT BACK TO US!! TWICE!!! > ><rant mode off> > >With regard to the aforementioned Mr. Fripp, I was at the "Space Music" >performance here in Toronto, and found it to be a highly entertaining >evening in many respects. When the sounds became less interesting, I >merely tuned them out and continued to converse with friends, many of >whom I hadn't seen for a long time, with one ear open to catch any >interesting changes. This, as I understand, was part of Robert's >expectation of me as an audient, and I was glad to oblige. It then took >on some aspects of certain John Cage events such as HPSCHD, where one is > >free to wander about the "space" and experience the sounds from different > >viewpoints. > >I hope this helps prod the thread back to relevance. > >Jim Bailey > > > >