Support |
Woehni <hovard@online.no> opined: >Ever since Eddie Van Halen came on the scene in the late 70`s and up to >the breakthrough >of Nirvana in the nineties ..... (time passes...) >...The ideal beeing that Mysterious Warrior that came in from the storm with his Axe in hand , Ready To Rock (tm) at any moment. Unleashing viscous and erupting >runs and licks. A Punisher , A Wildman , A demon!!!! Macho , macho , macho was very important.Not to mention macho. If you add these ideals to the image of the guitarists with >Thight leather pants , big pouting red lips , steelchains around the waist and a guitar that looks like its made to penetrate bodily cavities , WHADDYA GET????? > >Homoerotic expression. WRONG, buffalo breath! All of the above fails to mention the WOMEN - most of 'em in their teens like the male attendees - that were inexplicably attracted to (and here's the formula): 1. Tight leather pants (sporting armadillos most likely) 2. Big, pouting, red lips 3. Steel chains everywhere, not just the waist 4. Big hair And, while I've not been to a Cinderella/Pos'in/Ratt concert in this universe, stories regarding their groupies were somewhat common in those days... FEMALE groupies, kids. The talk about the main audiences being composed of boys may well be a smoke screen for the fact that many of the bands-in-question were very organized in getting women from the audience for after-show parties... Somehow I don't think America's Dads are ready to admit that was happening... [snicker] So, homoeroticism? Bullocks! Even the New York Dolls knew that something about the androgynous look attracted the 'more sophisticated' ladies.. :) Stephen Goodman * It's... The Loop Of The Week! EarthLight Studios * http://www.earthlight.net/Studios