Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
>Nor is the emphasis on using someone elses moods to actualize your own groove - Its about how to effectively bend or adapt things - sounds or better yet fragments of something typically or atypically associative to your own perspective then letting go of it and letting it roll on its on steam. Most Critics and the public get off on that piece of the picture alone. > Uh, it depends upon the qualifications of said DJ, and what they are using. If you read my entire argument and undertand the context of it and do not decontextualize it in your field then you will understand my point, from my view. To some small degree as far as my functional controls and comprehension I set up cds, but from my point of view the mood is established through the music itself because unlike with records it is the cd itself which promotes a certain mood or vibe. The context in which I put it, it's entrances and exits, is another part of my creating an overall effect, but again as a hiphop DJ there is completely different set of rules. I do not maintain I am traditional or know what I am talking about but with respect to myself and those with aforementioned limited controls, I am accurate to 32 degrees. You say the music belongs to know one, then you to some degree refute yourself because simultaneously you are admitting it has it's own life, it's own vibe. I only contextualize it man. You have a logical question here to deal with. With regard to who a DJ is, I disagree, but I can see from a hiphop perspective where you see the DJ. For me, it is actually quite removed from the street, I do not scratch, I am something quite else. I hope that you understand my refutations, and I'm not really sure why I'm making them except to say that your view as well as mine are our own, and specific to our own experiences, I did suggest that music was from someone else's music, and actually I will maintain it, as for control of that vibe that is ours. "The bass dropped-- you knew you were here." Mjh