Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
>I do believe that looping products in general need to be thought out more >clearly. I believe that who put's out the next one of these babys should >send a few to the very intense loopers in these pages and get their >feedback >so hey can learn...and therefore will sell a better product and will sell >more of that better product...taking into consideration that the pricing >would suit the product. >Jeff Collins well, seeing as how there are quite a few looping tool developers and manufacturers ON this list already, and that members of this list have already contributed heavily to the features found in current looping devices, what more would you like to tell them? (or us, as it were) dod is noticeably absent here, and the results are apparent. So *some* manufacturers ought to be paying more attention. Bear in mind that DOD is owned by the same company as lexicon, where looping is a dirty word now.... I imagine that's why they aren't marketing it for looping and are trying to pass it off as some sort of dj product. At the NAMM show I talked with a senior engineer from digitech (another fine Harman company) who on one hand seemed to think that existing digitech products had good looping functions, and on the other hand was completely unaware of the whole RDS/PDS/TimeMachine product line and the degree of interest people still have for those! So don't expect much on that front either.... kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com