Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
If the unit works as you say ("the unit worked fine with the supplied
50secs of memory"), fine with one set of simms, and not another then
the simms are to be suspected, not the EDP. I have a wide variety of
mixed used simms in my 2 EDPs, no issues.
Defective or damaged ram is not an uncommon problem (I am in volume
manufacturing of storage devices) . There is nothing to sort out,
since the EDP works fine with the 50 sec of memory. The EDP works,
the new Simms don't.
bret
Claude Lassonde <classonde@psbgm.qc.ca> wrote:
>
> What a mess... The service people at the company should post
comments over
> here to sort things out... Any Gibson-Oberheim-Echoplex tech around?
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Douglas Lawrence [mailto:douglas-lawrence@home.com]
> > Sent: dimanche, août 09, 1998 01:44
> > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> > Subject: RE: Echoplex memory
> >
> >
> > My Echoplex is now back at Oberheim being checked out for the
> > same reasons.
> > I haven't heard back from them what the problem was.
> >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Marc Roche [mailto:govinda@cyber-dyne.com]
> > >>Sent: Saturday, August 08, 1998 10:16 PM
> > >>To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> > >>Subject: Re: Echoplex memory
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Hi all,
> > >>
> > >>I just sent my new (7/1) EDP back to Oberheim yesterday. Tried
> > >>two different
> > >>batches of simms from two different retailers and neither of them
> > >>worked (the
> > >>unit worked fine with the supplied 50secs of memory). Could I
> > >>have been so
> > >>unlucky as to get bad simms twice? Hope to be getting an answer
soon.
> > >>Kim Flint wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> It works with parity or non-parity simms, and it doesn't matter
> > >>if you mix
> > >>> them or max the memory or whatever. (the parity bit is
> > >>ignored.) That's in
> > >>> the echoplex FAQ on the LD website. The problems a few people
> > >>had seemed to
> > >>> be from some bad batch of simms, and nobody has reported
> > >>anything like it
> > >>> since. In general it's always worked fine with any type simm
> > >>out there, and
> > >>> there isn't any known problem with fully loaded memory. I've
> > heard that
> > >>> reported a couple times and it always turned out to be
> > >>something else. (like
> > >>> a bad simm...)
> > >>>
> > >>> kim
> >
>
>
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com