Support |
>>Hi Edward , I don`t think collage techniques could be regarded as theft , because you are not stealing/using the product but the IMAGE of it. You are using pictures of it. Or in the case of that torched Mac-keyboard , Mac`s product lies in the performance of the machine the technology , the reliability etc. That artist wasn`t using Macintosh to boost his own similar product. At least thats what I think......... Yours , Thomas <<< Whoa...Wed morning, pre-coffee mode and I find the most blisteringly attention-grabbing discussion on this list on a while.... Thomas, I'd consider "image" on a visual sense on par with "image" in an audio sense, so I don't see a real distinction. Sampling a 5 second sound source from a commercially available CD is analagous to clipping out a corner of a Lichtenstein (haha!) poster and using that in a piece of "otherwise original" art and making and selling posters. As far as the performance of a Mac being a selling point, I think the designers and marketing people had a creative "artistic" hand in its final appearance. Commercial art is a creative art form and so I could assume that again my artist friend was "stealing" from a commercial artist's design. Being a "self-aggrandizing outlaw composer", I've released recordings with uncleared samples. I haven't read the Fair Use laws, but my personal sense of ethics is satisfied from the fact that, tho I used a 5 second Snow White sample, there's no way that any Disney fan would divert their disposable income from a Disney purchase to one of my releases. Anyways, no use preaching to the converted, it seems. I hate to waste bandwidth but this reminds me of an article I read about Lejaren Hiller, the computer music composer who died a couple years ago. He had planned to write a program which would produce every combination and permutation of diatonic harmony and melody in 4/4 in a 3 1/2 minute time length with only major and minor chords, etc... He wanted to then print out all these scores and then send them out to get copyrighted. You see, he HATED rock and roll, and theorized that copyright infringement would enable him to put a stop to it.... I'm not sure it couldn't work...