Support |
This is a very interesting discussion, and we can look at things from several different perspectives: -- What are the theoretical legal rights of those who write music, perform it, produce it, sample it, sell it and so on? -- What rights do these people have in practice, given that wealth and power do have a major effect on the application of legal principles? -- What are the ethical issues involved here, since what is legal is not necessarily ethical, and what is illegal is not necessarily unethical? -- What are the aesthetic issues involved here; e.g., why is a work deemed to be creative, or derivative, or a mixture of both? -- How do we feel about these issues as consumers of the musical culture's output? But, I'd like to look at this from another, culturally removed, point of view. In Java, there are ancient traditions that guide the composition of new gamelan works. New pieces are welcomed, but they must not depart radically from what is already in the standard repertoire. It is quite common, and acceptable, to create a new composition based almost entirely on another one, with just a few new wrinkles thrown in. The Javanese culture, of which the gamelan tradition is just a part, values cooperation and harmony much more than individualism and originality. When we start to think in absolute terms about what is right or what should be done, it can be an eye-opening experience to consider things from the point of view of a very different culture. -Peter