Support |
>From loopers-delight-request@annihilist.com Thu Oct 8 06:34:36 1998 >Received: (from kflint@localhost) > by rosy.yourwebhost.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) > id JAA17029; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 09:32:21 -0400 >Resent-Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 09:32:21 -0400 >X-Authentication-Warning: rosy.yourwebhost.com: kflint set sender to Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com using -f >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 10:16:02 +0400 >Message-ID: <00019D7B.4007@poyry.com.br> >From: miguel.barella@poyry.com.br (MAT) >Subject: Y2K >To: "'Loopers Delight'" <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Description: cc:Mail note part >Resent-Message-ID: <"KbnI-3.0.Tv2.1nB7s"@rosy.yourwebhost.com> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1945 >X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com > >Does anybody know if loop machines, delays, reverbs etc. will be affected by the >Y2K bug? > >Miguel > > Oh, my...... Unless the device has a dedicated imbedded chip that checks a system date, there is no need to worry. Currently I am a Programmer working at a client site, and my only task is to make Systems Y2K complient......so I have some idea what I am talking about. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com