RE: RE: Looping Catching on? dt's potential disclaimer

[Paul.C.Wright@ercgroup.com]

If I might throw my $.02 in, I've found DT's response times to be more than
adequate, and applaud the fact that he takes the time to interact with us 
at
all, other than as a voyeur.  I was just telling my wife a couple of weeks
ago about a on-line coversation that I had had with DT regarding BLUE, and
the upcoming release of one of my favs - Jim Carroll, and how refreshing it
was to talk to an artist who felt that our viewpoints were worth 
discussing.
It's just not found often...

As far as looping catching on; it has...

Ciao,

-----Original Message-----
From: Texture444@aol.com [mailto:Texture444@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 1999 11:31 AM
To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
Subject: Re: RE: Looping Catching on? dt's potential disclaimer



i haven't yet read this in-print version of my so-called 'view of looping',
so:
i can't confirm that what's been printed is what i actually *said* (or,
even:
*think*):
sounds suspicious, though, as i *certainly* do support & encourage loop-
education (& proselytizing, to some degree),
especially in regards to relevant m.i. manufacturers.
and: i, for one, am convinced that 'looping' *is*, in fact, becoming
increasingly validated out there in the dual worlds of music *&
music-stuff*.
best,
dt

ah yeah, to the apparently mildly embittered rodrigo, since ya posted
publicly:
sorry.
i hope you'll understand that i'm engaged in an extremely busy,
responsibility-laden life:
family w/children/friends/gigs/recording/travel/etc.....:
life, yo!!!
i'm finding its rather difficult (& slow-going) to respond personally to 
all
the 'requests for info' that arrive, here, via mail & email:
no personal offense is intended by my long delays in reciprocating
correspondence.