Support |
For me, the answer is multifold: 1) As a guitarist, I can create sounds available no where else. This allows me to color my more conventional, melodic pieces. 2) I can create unpredictable pieces that let me get so lost in the moment, it is truely blissful. The improvisational value of looping is amazing. I can continuously apply sonic layer upon sonic layer or I can stop for a moment and absorb what I've done and allow my previous input to dictate my next move. Again, I can get so lost in my looping that it feels like meditation. 3) Having played in my fair share of bands, I am finally able to have a creative outlet where I am self-sufficient. I'm not poo pooing bands. I enjoy human interaction but right now, I thoroughly enjoy playing solo gigs with my looping gear, my guitar, and not much else. -----Original Message----- From: Morgan Lang <mhl21@columbia.edu> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> Date: Sunday, March 28, 1999 8:49 AM Subject: Why loop? >Hello, dear Loopers: > >Yes, it's question time! > >I just finished up a piece and was reminded of a question I meant to put >to >the list some time ago: why loop? I mean "why" in the fundamental sense of >addressing what it is about repetition that's good. Is "looping" >equivalent to >the broader category of "repetition," or is it a particular type or method of >repetition? Aside from the obvious mechanistic differences, are there >qualitative differences between music that is made by repeating phrases >in, >ahem, "real" time and music in which repetition is achieved by looping? >Are >these differences audible? > >I would imagine from the responses to the "things vs. computers" debate that >lots of people use looping devices in order to do solo performances in which >multiple parts can be controlled by the performer. If the "looping vs. >repetition" question doesn't interest anyone, maybe people could describe the >enabling or limiting aspects of performing solo or in duos as opposed to >ensemble playing where looping is rendered less necessary. > >Best, > >Morgan Hamilton Lang. >