Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
SoundFNR@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 26/05/99 20:36:21 GMT Daylight Time, > dbaldwin@suffolk.lib.ny.us writes: > > > As long as it has a sample-and-hold function, discussion here at > > LD seems appropriate. > Actually I have a notion that this isn't what you think. > Sample-and-hold=looper? right? > > Not really a looper that I have noticed, but then I got it for patch 10, >the > aforementioned Adrian Belew Backwards guitar patch, great patch! > > Thanks to all for the info on this ped so far. > At the moment i'm veering towards giving it a miss for the following >reasons > 1) not tweakable > One of the best things about the Space Station is that its not tweakable. The worst thing about it is that its not tweakable. I have gotten so much gear now that somthing that is plug and play is almost a relief.Option Anxiety rears it head. the pedal does its own type of tweaking in its own right. wish it had at least a couple of knobs though....sigh > 2) too 'digital sounding' > Very true, even more than its big bro' the Digitech Super Smart Shift I-PBS33B, (gotta love that name) in fact alot of the string and harmonizer patches are taken from it seems to me. Sometimes that is good though to me. > 3) I'm looking for something to vary the sound without echoing, and that > leaves > out a lot of the SS presets it seems. > 4) It doesn't have a whammy patch (some people want everything). > .......still considering though. > Glutton that I am I bought both the whammy and the SS, now I can put my sustainor into upper octave range hit the Whammy up 2 octaves in reverse play before it hits the Jamman and then the Vortex.... well sorry, ahem, wearing of ear plugs is highly recommened if you try this! my 2 or 3 cents worth, Jeff http://members.xoom.com/echo17/tbl.html > > Andy Butler > Lexicon Vortex Database (newish section on undocumented features) > http://members.aol.com/soundfnr/vortex.htm >