Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
heh, yeah the problem is that i wouldn't be able to control three seperate devices as you suggest with my foot and one spare hand. maybe it's my dexterity that needs improvement. heh, thanks.. On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Travis Hartnett wrote: [.Less than $300? Sorry, no. There's only two real-time performance oriented [.loopers on the market right now, the Echoplex and the Boomerang. Both have [.their merits, but neither does any filter manipulation (and both are [.significantly more than $300). Both have reverse features, the Boomerang [.also has an option to play back a loop at half-speed with corresponding loss [.in fidelity. All of the sampler-based devices I'm aware of have some [.real-time performance issues (e.g. can't create a loop and overdub [.seamlessly, can't continuously overdub, etc). For what you're wanting, I [.suspect you'd need a good looping device, a mixer, and a filterbank in the [.effects loop. I'd suggest either sliding your Expectation slider way down, [.or your Acceptable Price slider way up. [. [.TH [. [.---------- [.>From: James Pearce <jamesrp@statenet.com> [.>To: "Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com" <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> [.>Subject: such a lame beginner [.>Date: Tue, Aug 10, 1999, 12:10 PM [.> [. [.> [.> I'm just looking for some more (if not redundant from others previous posts) [.> suggestions. I was almost willing to run out and buy a headrush but after [.> hearing that there is no infinite loop option I've now begun looking [.> elsewhere. And as always affordability is a must (anything less than 300). [. [. [.jamesrp@statenet.com.]