Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Boomerang and DL4 - URL to DL4 docs???



Here it is:

http://www.line6.com/support/library.htm

Go to the Looper Document 

Gary
> ----------
> From:         L Tremblay[SMTP:ltct@concentric.net]
> Reply To:     Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Sent:         Thursday, October 14, 1999 11:45 AM
> To:   Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject:      Re: Boomerang and DL4 - URL to DL4 docs???
> 
> What's the URL to the DL4 docs? I couldn't find it
> anywhere on the Line6 site.
> 
> thanks
> 
> Larry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weideman, Gary L (Gary) <weideman@lucent.com>
> To: 'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com' <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
> Date: Thursday, October 14, 1999 12:00 PM
> Subject: RE: Boomerang and DL4
> 
> 
> >Matt,
> >
> >Thanks for the response. Do you (or anyone else) know what the sampling
> rate
> >is the the DL4 ?? I'm wondering if it is close to a JamMan or EP or 
>lower
> >like the Rang. I would like to get a looper that is at least as good as
> the
> >JamMan since I'm playing acoustic guitar and want the loop sample to be
> >pretty good.
> >
> >Thanks in advance
> >
> >G. Weideman
> >
> >> ----------
> >> From: Matthias Grob[SMTP:matthias@grob.org]
> >> Reply To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 10:34 PM
> >> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> >> Subject: RE: Boomerang and DL4
> >>
> >> >I've heard from another local music store that the DL4 is coming the
> end
> >> of
> >> >the month.
> >> >
> >> >I printed out the DL4 manual from Line6's website. It appears that 
>the
> >> pedal
> >> >is 24-bit from the documentation although I'm not sure  if that
> literally
> >> >means that the sampling rate is 24-bit for the looper, can anyone
> confirm
> >> >that ?
> >>
> >> dont worry about this too much. The converter is not 24bits anyway, 
>and
> >> its
> >> quality cannot be expressed in bits really. Even 16bit converters
> usually
> >> dont use the last bit truely.
> >> The processor calculates in 24 or 32bits internally. This is a must 
>and
> >> does not say anything either.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>          ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>