Re: Mesa Boogie Mark amps

["Alan Imberg" <alan_i@sprynet.com>]

I have owned a Mark II and Mark III head and am the current owner of a DC 5
head. The differences between the Mark II and III (for that matter the Mark
IV as well) is the amount of options. The Mark II was rather simple for
dialing in tone. The Mark III, with its supposed 3 channel option, took me 
a
bit more time to find the tones I was looking for. Being a former "plexi"
Marshall owner, I was a bit overwhelmed at the tonal possibilities that the
Mark III offered. The Mark IV was something I didn't feel compelled to try
because of the additional options it offered over the Mark III. However,
I've gotten over that and have grown to love and rely on the options that 
my
current DC 5 set-up gives me. The constant qualities that have kept me a
loyal Boogie owner for 15 years is the consistently great tone and the
durability.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Dlangenes@aol.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 1999 2:34 AM
Subject: re: Mesa Boogie Mark amps


> Loopers,
>
> Anyone have any opinions on the Mesa Boogie "Mark" amps? Is the Mark III
> better than the Mark IV? What about the Mark I? Is one considered more
> "classic" than another? Does it matter? Does anything matter? Is there a
god?
> Anyone?
>
> David
>