Support |
Several months ago, Brian Eno did the back page of Wired magazine. In the article he described a session in a new fully digital recording studio, with a software driven "board" as the least creative time he's spent in a recording studio, ever. The gear was so infinitely programmable, he was never able to become "intimate" with the gear. With infinite possibilities, one can explore forever and end up with nothing in the end. I've been doing the digital audio/midi thing for a long, long time... in chip years, that is, and to me it's very, very seductive to want "the new toy." The problem is that as soon as you become comfortable with the tool, version 2.0 comes out, so you learn that, and then another company comes out with something that's supposedly better, so you'd better buy that and then... before you know it, you're out of money and haven't created ANYTHING WHICH IS WHY YOU GOT THE THING IN THE FIRST PLACE!! I do computer based 2 and 3D animation, and interactive work as well, so after a while it can become pretty obvious how overwhelmed one can become. BUT I KEEP ON GETTING THE NEW TOYS AND LEARNING THEM, I'M ADDICTED TO TECHNOLOGY! HA HA HA HA HA! But I'm getting better. I also think that soon a time will come where new features will become less and less important, and usability and performance/price will become issues. Cheaper hardware. Less RAM hungry software. I'm boycotting Adobe Premiere 5.1 (video editing software) due to its more convoluted interface and poor performance. Version 4 does everything I want it to do for now. This can become problematic when working with other's, but I'll fall off that bridge when I get to it. Sometimes you just have to say, "No." Sometimes the lo-tech way is the way to go. Mark Sottilaro Multimedia Specialist Center for Digital Media San Francisco Art Institute (415) 711-7020 ext. 4411