Support |
yes we are ... Christopher White wrote: > haahha now we are silly for sure! > ---------- > >From: Jimmy George <jimmyg@jimmygeorgearts.com> > >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > >Subject: Re: It's and Its > >Date: Thu, Dec 9, 1999, 3:03 AM > > > > >I am sorry that was me that you actually bow to. I supppose one arm >actually > >took > >your massive fingers of gold and I supppose I find it a bit scary. I >have > >sinned with > >your silver tongue and your typing fingers of apostrophes. SINNED! > >c.white > > > >Christopher White wrote: > > > >> Javier, > >> > >> I am sorry that was me typing with my child in one arm and not >being to > >> careful in my placement of apostrophes. I supppose I find it a bit >scary > >> that you actually took the time to point out my mistake in grammar on >my > >> email. I bow to your massive english powers! Anoint me with your >silver > >> tongue and your typing fingers of gold! I have sinned...SINNED!... >and its > >> it's it is so bad. > >> c.white > >> ---------- > >> >From: "Javier Miranda V." <gnominus@earthling.net> > >> >To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> > >> >Subject: It's and Its > >> >Date: Wed, Dec 8, 1999, 11:01 PM > >> > > >> > >> ><body> > >> ><non-looping content> > >> > > >> >Did everybody agree to use "it's" and "its" wrong almost everytime? > >> > > >> >Come on, people, if you cannot substitute "it is" for "it's," then >the > >> >apostrophe doesn't belong there. > >> > > >> >For example: > >> > > >> > despite it's stigma as being a beat orientated machine.. > >> > > >> >Would it sound right to say: > >> > > >> > despite it is stigma as being a beat orientated machine.. > >> > > >> >Apparently not. > >> > > >> >Further, this should be written thus: > >> > > >> > despite its stigma as being a beat-oriented machine... > >> > > >> ></non-looping content> > >> ></body> > >> > > >> >Thank you. I just had to say something about it. > >> > > >