Support |
> A friend of mine uses a couple of reel-to-reels for all his music > sequencing/recording, he can't afford a sampler and/or computer. > Yep, one of the origins of sampling and sequencing, and it still works great. Sounds better, too, IMHO. > He sequences by cutting up individual notes and drum hits on the tape, >and > then joins them together into loops. These loops are his sequences. Does anyone remember the pre-digital era records called Drum Drops? This series of LP's contained real cheesy studio-recorded drum tracks of *realdrums* in a variety of styles. They were called Drum Drops because you basically 'dropped them into the rhythm track' on tape, building up a complete drum track 2 to 4 measures at a time, i.e., a sequence of drum samples. > To keep things in time he draws a graph on a piece of paper so that he > knows how long each note/beat/sequence/etc. should be, showing him where to > cut the tape. > > His reel-to-reel has an old telescopic radio antenna attached to the front, > with something on top of the antenna for the tape to 'roll' over, and he > extends the antenna upwards to hold the loop tight. > > He runs these loops on a two track reel-to-reel and then records them >onto > a 4 track reel-to-reel to allow layering/multi-tracking of multiple > loops/sequences. > > He has 'racks' on the wall with all his tape loops hanging on them. > > Total lo-fi sampling/looping, it's really amazing what he does with it. > > It really gives a loose feel, seemingly more 'organic' and 'real' than > computer based sequencing. > I agree. Tape is still one of the most rewarding, if time consuming, methods of looping and sampling. Some things are actually easier to do with tape. - Larry T > > > > >You an use any reel to reel for looping. The Revox is > >just a *nice to have* for it's simplicity and quality. > > > >I still prefer the sound and tactile simplicity of analog > >looping over digital. > > > >Gino wong - who's an LD member - sent me a spare loop arm > >he had lying around which is very useful for setting up > >loops of varying length. I imagine these can be salvaged > >from broken recorders. > > > >Check the archives under "loop arm". November 1999, I > >think. > > > >BTW, Gino - I figured out the mic clip thing for holding > >the loop arm. Works like a charm! I have a few new ideas for > >an adjustable tapeloop device based on David Keane's excellent > >book, "Tape Music Composition" (1980). > > > >- Larry > > > >> anyone? > >> > >> i just inherited a fostex model 20 1/4" open reel deck. looping tool >or > >> bookend? (it looks nice enough, and i've got room in my studio to >have it > >> just sit there, but if i could make it earn its keep somehow when i 'm > >tired > >> of checking the edp faqs for simple answers to stupid questions, it would > >be > >> nice). > >> > >> (just don't say "well, if it was a revox...") > >> > >> lance g. > >> > >> > > > >