Support |
>>luca wrote: >> >>> CDRs (for computers) cost less than Audio CDs. >>> I have been told this difference ( in Italy it is about 1/2 U.s. $ ) >is a >>> sort of tax that is payed to majors or whatever because it is clear >that >>> people uses the specific Audio Cd to duplicate music. > >Audio CD-R vs. Data CD-R > >I've seen this several times. I don't understand why there's a >difference. I >can understand that a particular manufacturer might recommend using only >particular branded CD-Rs for recording, but I think that has to do with >the >combination of dyes in the CD-R and recording technology (laser freq, >intensity, >etc). > >I don't think there any inherent difference between an audio CD-R and a >data >CD-R. Check out http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/ > well, there may not be any "inherent differences" but rest assured that a CD-R WILL NOT work in a CD-AUDIO only recorder. i have just discovered this the hard way - i am the audio production specialist for the university of notre dame and i was told point blank by a salesman that the unit i bought WOULD use normal cd-r's WRONG! so i now have to pay $1.50 more per cd for this unit to work - which is a substantial loss to my line of business. traig Traig Foltz Audio Production Specialist University of Notre Dame Office of Information Technology Office: (219)631 - 3752 Fax: (219) 631 - 8777