Support |
Hi Bret: We think your comments are right on target. We had an old EDP that was rock solid. The new EDP we got a couple of months ago was a trainwreck disguised as a looper. We just hope Gibson has somebody over in England who really knows looping, and knows the capabilities of the EDP, and can figure out how to do global batch testing. Best, Roctologists ---------- >From: Bret <echoplex@yahoo.com> >To: baumhaus@earthlink.net, Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: Re: Wow >Date: Thu, Jun 15, 2000, 3:23 PM > > Luis, > I have 3 (oberheim) echoplexes that were purchased > over the past 3-5 yrs. I have had no downtime due to > edp failure. The only part I have had to replace due > to failure was a fuse. > > I think what we are seeing is a new factory, and all > the changes and variables that introduces (build and > test equipment, new assemblers, testers, failure > analysis techs, rework people, possibly new suppliers > of parts ...) > > The design and software for the edp seem quite robust > to me, but it may take the new factory a few > production runs to work out the kinks of building and > testing edps. > > This is just my speculation, based on my experience > with edps, the comments here as of late, and my > experience in volume manufacturing and test of > electronics. > > bret > >> Luis Angulo wrote: >> >> > Do people spend more time fixing the EDP as >> playing with it?I am hearing >> > they are still selling them with bugs and problems >> > I hope the new ones are being watched with a bit >> more consideration for the >> > consumers! >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! > http://photos.yahoo.com >