Support |
Thanks for the recommends guys. I'll be going with Logic then. Unless there's some pro-Cubase sentiment out there? Thanks for the reminder about the problems with Windows Cubase. There have been alot of problems with it, especially with dongle issues, on the Cubase forum. I'd somehow forgotten about that. I've been looking around the Emagic website trying to find a little bit more info and found this interesting interview with none other than David Torn, hisself: http://www.emagicusa.com/viplounge/interviews/davidtorn.html After reading the interview, I've got another question I'd like to ask. Has anyone here done any online musical collaborations, via the Rocket Network software available for Cubase and Logic, or otherwise? It's a rather intriguing idea. Ben Porter. ------Original Message------ From: "Martin Shellard" <martins@pwdu.demon.co.uk> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com, Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Sent: October 23, 2000 1:32:27 PM GMT Subject: Re: software based Loopers Although this may not be of use to you PC users, any mac loopers out there should check out MOTU Digital Performer. Not only is it the most well thought out and "professional" sequencer (by that I mean the foundations of the app are solid with no hidden bloopers) but it has a built in looper called POLAR. You specify a time range and enter the polar window where you have a multi-track loop recorder, you can overdub on separate tracks and mix/pan. The recording is done in RAM so it's super fast and when you have your loop you can bounce it to disk either as a mix or onto separate tracks. As far as cubase v Logic, well I'm not a fan of either and I've used both but cubase on a PC? Forget about it, it has the WORST reputation of any DAW in history, I was on the cubase user list for a while and the number of complaints from PC cubase users was staggering, the thing can't even play audio and midi in time. Logic, although not very friendly and somewhat flawed in it's design is way, way better than cubase. Step time entry is pretty much the same in both. Martin Shellard ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup