Support |
My brother Anton got one of the DG Stomps and they sound quite good -- good clean and gain sounds, and a nice reverb -- (much better than the POD, IMO). Also, it has the digital output (SPDIF) , which is nice for digital audio recording, although, strangely, we could not get it to work with Cubase (although other digital sources seem to work fine...). I've never the J-station, though, so i can;t compare it to that. - Chris >You know what? I think the Yamaha DG Stomp may be the way to go. I own a >POD and loved it--until my friend and jam-mate got a DG Stomp. First off, >the effects are measurably better. Second, there's what seems to me a >deeper level of control over all the parameters. Third, there's >footswitches! It's built like a stomp-box, which the POD a J-Station are >not, making them near useless live without additional hardware (footswitch >or MIDI gear). I have also been impressed by the tone, though I haven't >had too much opportunity to tinker with it. I do know Guitar Player (Joe >Gore, I think) reviewed it and it won an Editors' Choice award with some >superlative commentary. > >My 2.23 Yen. > > > > > > Mark > > Sottilaro To: >Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > <sine@zerocro cc: > > ssing.net> Subject: OT: Johnson JStation >VS. Line6 Pod > > > 12/13/00 > > 05:04 PM > > Please > > respond to > > Loopers-Delig > > ht > > > > > > > > >Hey > >I've been doing more recording than playing lately, and it's made me think >that a good tube modeling preamp may be the way to go. I bought a Line 6 >Spyder, and I like it, but I've been seeing the Johnson JStation around. >I >know the Line 6 is held in pretty high regard. I also know that Adrian >Belew swears by Johnson amps. > >Any opinions welcome. > >Thanks. > >Mark