Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
This all sounds great, and jives with what we've been hearing so far... it's heartening at least that the product exists in some physical manifestiation of metal and plastic and blinky leds. I'm kind of disappointed in Damon, as he seemed like a truly non 'marketing guy' marketing guy, but whatever, he was probably feeding us the same line he was fed by someone else. Damon, Electrix, please do not give us a product with buggy software upon release. I've seen this happen with too many great products/software packages. It's an age-old story... the engineers set deadlines for themselves under pressure from management, marketing goes into overdrive for the product launch, and it keeps getting pushed back until finally marketing and/or management can't take it anymore and push the half-baked product out the door, much to the dismay of the users. The engineers keep working to support the thing with endless patches, but the damage has been done, and the product's reputation is shot. If there's a remote chance it's not going to be ready by March, say so now and take the pressure off yourselves so that we the users can have a product we can trust. I can't speak for the rest of the group, but I'll wait. I would rather hear "It'll be done when it's done" than "It'll be ready by january! I mean march! I mean june! umm... 2003?" -><- On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, rich wrote: > Howdy folks, > > Cliff and I went to the Namm show together, and headed for the > Electrix booth first thing. I just had to see if they had a > functioning unit there to get my hands on. here's the lowdown from > our short excursion into Repeaterland: > > Yes, it is pre-beta software. By self admission, they are not > releasing until March. The demo guy was pretty up front about this, > and obviously a little upset that he had to demo a machine that was > still buggy, and not fully functional. I was a little upset that > Damon was not very forthcoming about this info on the list, > especially since there is a group buy formed. Power supply? > bullshit...The demo guy said "We totally underestimated the > complexity of this machine". On the positive side, All of the boxes > are sitting in their warehouses, fully built and ready to go, they > just need to finalize the software, load it in via the CFC cards and > off they go. > > so...march then...maybe. > > other than that, the state the box was in was: > > Only one loop was active, and only two tracks of that one loop were > available. BUT...even with that and bugs...this unit is FUN!!!!!!! > > They had a demo setup with a guitar into POD into the Repeater. I > layed a volume swelled pad/drone on track 1, then switched to track 2 > to lay in a more percussive riff. Now, these are seperate! Yay! > two loops going simultaneously. hit the pitch button, engage track > one and alter the pitch of track one up an octave. Pitch is shown on > the front panel in semitones. > > This was a new one for me...I thought that you could change the pitch > or time on a loop, but that all four tracks would be affected. Not > so, to my delight. Wow. four independent tracks! On just one loop! > well, not quite...there's only two active tracks on the pre-beta > software at this point. > > Now i hit the pan button, engaged track 1 and shifted track 1 to hard > left. engage track 2 and panned it hard right. Zowee! Then i > engaged track 1 and track 2 and then started twisting the pan around. > Wow. the two loops started fluctuating around in the stereo field. > Did this mangling for about 20 seconds before i freaked out the > software and it got stuck. oops. reboot. > > The time stretching is quite dramatic. I originally recorded at 120 > bpm, and you can go down to like, 4 bpm, which introduced possibly > interesting artifacts, especially if post-processed. think fat boy > slim, here... > > One of the more interesting things i saw in the demo they did was > that the pitch shifting can be preprogrammed, so when you lay that > guitar riff in, what comes out on the first playback of the loop IS > PITCHSHIFTED. cool. you don't have to wait for playback and then > adjust pitch. > > there is more to the box, even in it's current state. i am going > back on saturday and maybe sunday, so if anyone has very specific > questions of something i can try out for ya, let me know. i will not > ask them anything about ship dates and such, since i don't really > feel like grilling Damon and the rest on behalf of LD. i'm sure he > will hear enough of it from the list. > > seeya! > > rich > > > > >Pre-beta?? The last word from Damon was a problem with the power supply > >suppliers the box was supposed to be out at least a month ago. What's > >the hold-up, electrix? we're jonesin for our gear fixes... nothing worse > >than a looper with the dt's... > > > >-><- > > > >On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Om_Audio wrote: > > > >> Saw and played with the infamous Repeater at NAMM- all I can say is >hold on > >> to your hats and get ready for the ride! Software was pre beta but >man o man > >> what a great box- > >> > >> Cliff > >> > >> >