Support |
Thank you, Kim. Well said! -----Original Message----- From: Kim Flint <kflint@loopers-delight.com> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Date: Sunday, February 25, 2001 5:40 PM Subject: Re: Jimi >At 11:32 AM -0800 2/25/01, scott kungha drengsen wrote: >> We wouldn't have this forum if it weren't for Jimi Hendrix. > >well, I created LD, and I have pretty much no interest in Jimi Hendrix and >hardly ever listened to him. I think I can fairly authoritatively state >that Looper's Delight would still exist even if Hendrix never had! > >So far as I can tell, Hendrix didn't have much (or any) influence on loop >based music. Did Hendrix influence hip-hop? no. kraftwerk, house, and >numerous other electronic dance spin-offs? no. The various tape loop and >soundscape/ambient pioneers? or Dub? not that I know of. He played rock >music, which mostly avoided/derided loops and samples for decades while >the >ideas developed elsewhere. Over the past ten years or so it seems the >opposite has happened, rock has been influenced by the looping cultures to >reinvent itself a few more times. > >>From my perspective, Hendrix is just another over-nostalgized baby boomer >icon that I'm tired of hearing about. Sorry if that bothers some of you, I >don't mean it with disrespect of the guy. That was music of my parent's >generation. (although my parents never listened to him either.) I never >really heard that stuff growing up, and it didn't mean much to me when I >did listen to it as an adult. For me, Hendrix is just another guy in a >documentary on the history channel, like say, Louis Armstrong. I listened >to it as music history education, and that was about it. That's probably >true for most people under the age of 35, and those are the people mostly >creating loop-based music... > >kim > >______________________________________________________________________ >Kim Flint | Looper's Delight >kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com > >