Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: RC-20 vs DL-4

What about the loop memory and quantize functions?  Are they just gimmicks with no real quality sound to support their claims or what... It seems like the DL4 does have much more diversity of delay and creativity, but I figured I'd still look in to the RC-20.  No one has really played with it yet that I know.

 

Any input on this new RC-20 loop station is greatly appreciated,

jhn

>From: "Paolo Valladolid"
>Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>Subject: RC-20 vs DL-4
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:43:53 -0500
>
>
>>I saw the RC-20 demoed at NAMM as well and I'd agree. I'd rather
>>have the
>>DL-4 any day. Even if the RC-20 were *cheaper*, rather than a tad
>>bit more
>>expensive.
>>Now, if it were a $50 pedal, I might reconsider.
>Because of sound quality? Because of usability?...
>
>Roberto
>
>No, because $50 for a looper pedal is a damn good deal!
>
>Paolo
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com