Support |
spgoodman@earthlight.net writes: >Nope, a turntable isn't a musical instrument no matter how great it >sounds. obviously, i disagree. >It might be supremely innovative and sometimes original how some folks >utilize such an electronic device or sampling unit for that matter to >create >(or more accurately, composite) music, but at the most a turntable can >only be used AS a musical instrument. following that line-of-thinking, i might then also conclude (like many already have done & may continue to do so, in future) that a looping device 'isn't a musical instrument', either --- indeed, it might be construed as one step further *away* from actually being a sound-'generator' --- (unless, of course, it's in a feedback-loop) --- than a turntable; oddly, i think i've been subject to this attitudinal mien, nearly my entire adult life..... aiyyyyy..................... >In case anyone's wondering my comment >wasn't a put-down of turntablists. ah, then i misunderstood you; sorry! it sounded so *definitive*, though..... >I was saying that the collaborative >dynamic is very, very different. yeah. but -not to be fatuous, here- what isn't 'different'? every interaction w/every individual (&/or set of) musician(s) i've *ever* played w/has revealed/grown its own dynamic: drummers, bands, saxophonists, 100-piece orchestras, sarodists, chainsaws, turntables, etc..... >When was the last time more than two >DJs got together in the same room to "play" together, anyway? i wouldn't know, really; don't get *out* much, these days. *-) i do know that i've got a buncha vinyl & discs w/multiple tablists upon them, though..... >Sometimes I think you wait for my comments specifically, DT. oh no, darling! *-) but they do have a certain..... ummmm..... resonance..... i mean no harm; just gotta speak-my-nonsensical-piece, here, once inna while..... btw: there's kim to thank (or, blame), fer that. best, dt / s-c