Support |
A pity late to mention surround as the alternative to the MONO shift salad of Phil Spector. Room sound is not a new thing.At least an old thing. After establishing Stereo Sound,the engineers were busy to make a quadrophonic sound in the early seventies. Traced from this,todays surround sound is old dutch cheese. Tjhe problem of todays surround is the compression.For movie it is OK.For Audio a worse situation. A Stereo signal gets splitted up in pseudo surround action.FARRRRRRRRRT....... Does someone remeber the World Exhibitiomn in Osaka 1970 ? Stockhausen had a Pavillion for surrounding sound on this fair.Does someone remember ? Well,the sound of this construction was much better as what we call today "SURROUND". It needed a flexible kind of live electronic musican,today we would call it DJ,to bring this sounds to the folks. 30 years later we still grabble in a sound,wich could be expanded more. I stil have not heard a DVD wich shows another direction.DVD can,but it depends on the artist. So todays surround is only a shadow of that,what could be really possible ! Martin ---------- >Von: "Italo De Angelis" <italoop@libero.it> >An: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> >Betreff: Re: Fractal looping >Datum: Mon, 21. Mai 2001 17:03 Uhr > >Well...2001...SURROUND ! ! ! > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Martin Tauchen" <Pohon-Kelapa@t-online.de> >To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 4:55 PM >Subject: Re: Fractal looping > > >> I donīt think that Italo follows the wall of sound of Phil Spector ! >Well >it >> was monophonic. >> >> Marty >> ---------- >> >Von: Claude Voit <c.voit@vtx.ch> >> >An: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >> >Betreff: Re: Fractal looping >> >Datum: Mon, 21. Mai 2001 18:35 Uhr >> > >> >> >Italo De Angelis wrote: >> >> >> >> ...and think you can do THIS all with just ONE POWERFUL unit, MARTIN >! >! ! >> >> >> > >> >Italo >> > >> >why do you own two of them ? >> >isnt one enough to fill the complete spectrum with a wall of sounds and >> >events >> >what could you use a second orville for >> > >> > >> >Claude >> > >> >