Support |
In a message dated 06/08/2001 7:45:36 PM, PaulPokr@aol.com writes: >Frankly, I don't know why many people are so ga-ga over the Repeater >anyway. for some very good (hopeful) reasons. >I'm not knocking it, but the EDP is here now. I see very little discussion >about the use of this complex unit. too busy *using* mine: dude! >Many people were waiting for the EDP's, >when they were not being manufactured, to be resurrected by Gibson/Trace >Elliot. I know many folks must have purchased them from Alto, based on >various discussions. There don't seem to be a lot of EDP evangelists >posting >to this board lately. well, i love the EDP: love it: love it! gonna use a repeater, too. and a pcm42. >Anyhow, I've been making some of the best music I ever have in my life >using the EDP. how? technically, i mean: above, you complained of the lack-of-discussion, re:EDP, soooooo: give us some tips! favorite functiosn, etc..... >True, there are things that may be easier done with the Repeater (e.g. >saving loops). Nonetheless, there's already a great looper, certainly >the best >currently available for a resonable price, in the Echoplex Digital Pro. right!, though 'best' is a funny word, here, as some folks get ***tons*** of functionality from less-featured looping instruments: important to know that, methinks. as a dedicated loop-head, though, i don't view these two instruments: EDP / Repeater: ---which are the only truly *freshly configured* feature-rich high-end realtime loopers, i'd say--- , as being pitted against each other, as their feature-sets are quite different: so far, i know that i gotta use the both of them. (pretty voracious of me, eh?) bleep, dt / s-c