Support |
Bullocks. China's insistence upon the use of coal as a MAJOR source of energy guarantees that the 17% figure is a complete lie. Since when has China adhered to a single treaty they've ever signed anyway? Kyoto 'accord' is a smokescreen for diplomatic egg-throwing at the US in more than just a few circles, and not just the reactionary right either. ----- Original Message ----- From: "K. Michael Odnaloc" <billowhead@hotmail.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: 19 June 2001 00:41 AM Subject: OT: Behringer, Slight Return > Seeing as how Behringer took some flak for manufacturing gear in China, I > was just wondering if anyone has looked at the back of their new Electrix > gear. > > I think you can guess the answer to that one. > > And just to confuse the issue further, I just read that China has >actually > managed to lower its emissions of greenhouse gases (by about 17% since 1992 > (or therabouts)) while its economy expanded. I believe that the un-elected > president of the US withdrew from the Kyoto protocols because he said it > would hurt our economy to lower emissions. Maybe he should talk to some of > the folks in China. > > But then again, there is Tibet and.... > > confused, bemused and slightly amused > > Kevin > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > >