Support |
I think they mostly all work like that, to some extent or another. I don't think anybody would design a looper in such a way that everybody had to use it with a mixer for even the most simple applications. kim At 10:21 AM 8/15/2001, M. Steven Ginn wrote: >Thanks Kim. > >Do all looping devices operate in this way, or do some require some type >of direct path to be maintained so that if looping isn't desired, the >original sound will be heard? > >Steve > > > At 06:37 AM 8/15/2001, M. Steven Ginn wrote: > > >I was wondering, if the EDP is placed in the audio patch in > > series (for > > >example, after compresssion and before effects), how is the signal > > >passed through while the EDP is not being used? Is it necessary to > > >have another channel that is unaffected (non-looped) routed > > around the > > >EDP so as to bypass the EDP if desired? Or does the EDP > > have a bypass > > >switch like other types of effects processors? > > > > there is a direct path and a loop path. the two are mixed > > together at the > > output, and the levels of each are controlled by the "Mix" > > knob on the > > front. So for simple applications you don't need a mixer. > > (there are also > > input and output volume controls.) ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com