Support |
> Couldn't you record a 'disposable loop' first, to create the timing, then > create your longer loop based on that, and then your second, shorter >loop, > the same length as the first one? Or, go back and overdub the original loop, > if it was silent to begin with. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dennis Leas" <dennis@mdbs.com> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:28 PM > Subject: Re: Can we take a second... > > > > > In this case you would have to record the shorter loop first, >multiply > it > > > and then record the longer loop. > > > > > >