Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Actually, the suggestion to opt for 'overflow' recording (having the Repeater begin recording seamlessly on a different track in the same loop) sounds at least like it might be more feasible technically, yes? Whether or not a true looping overdub feature was implemented at some point, this would still be an interesting option. FWIW. Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Sottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:42 PM Subject: Re: Bump issue. > Why not have it (the ability to do directly into overdub) available when > recording in stereo only? Or if that's still to hard, have it in mono record > mode? I'd still be happy with that. > > Mark > > "Damon Langlois (Electrix)" wrote: > > > We are looking at reducing the "bump" at the loop splice point. Going > > immediately into overdub is a bigger deal but is also being looked at. This > > is the price you might have to pay for 4 tracks per loop. There is a lot > > more going on under the hood than a mono looper. > > > > Let us also put things into perspective. "Blemish free" drones where a > > contiguous signal passes over the loop point are not really possible with > > any looper. (Get your sine waves out and try it). It's a matter of making it > > less audible which is where the multiple overdub technique come in. We want > > to look at the loop splice point first and see if we can improve this area > > before we get into the immediate overdub issue, especially since there are > > work arounds for this. > > > > Respect, > > > > Damon Langlois > > Creative Director > > Electrix > > Tel (250) 544-4091 Fax (250) 544-4100 > > http://www.electrixpro.com >