Support |
bickleypunk@pdq.net writes: >For those that have implied that Fripp claims to have "invented" looping, >and to those that think that Fripp labeled his approach Frippertronics >as some sort of ego-maniacal trademark - I think you're wrong. >Why not actually research what Fripp has said on the subject himself?? > It took me about 15 minutes to find this. <fripp in GP, '86 snipped> right..... i've seen that; thanks. me: i never said that i perceived robert as having claimed the invention-of-tape-looping. what *has* always struck me, though, is the apparent wide-ranging belief that this is so..... which seems largely to be (unwittingly) disseminated by both his fans & his disciples. so: as robert is, indeed, a pedagogue --- to wit, there exists his self-created 'guitar craft', & his many public verbal (&clearly, pedagogic) musings --- it also seems to me that it might 'follow' that he might have spoken, at some point, to that issue of organic 'revisionism', directed towards those very same students & disciples who are paying attention to the rest of his 'education'. i see robert as an erudite character, & presume that he must be well aware of both his own influence & at least *some* segment of the earlier members of the 'lineage of looping'; in fact, in many ways, his public persona seems to be well-focussed on clarifying all kindsa 'misperceptions' re: music/the business/personality, etc for his listeners, which begs the question: why not the same treatment for looping? he is, after all, both a teacher *and*, obviously, a critical node in the lineage. best, dt / s-c