Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
no foul. I think we both made the mistake of answering a question in absolutes, when it's a bit of a gray area. For my application, the Repeater behaves fine, you've got obvious and justified beefs in the way the Repeater loops. Believe me, I was on this list for the year of "it will be out soon..." and the "Woops, the bug free software we promised will be out soon..." times. I was a beta tester of OS 1.1 I respect Electrix's decision of making me a beta tester even though my company's been developing a rival product, The Againinator. When it's finally done, it will have the glitch free loops you so long for, and will fetch your newspaper each morning. Mark >Mark - > >no harm. no problem. I just consider starting a loop at any time something >rather specific. It's great that you are getting it on the point as you >have >described. I was merely pointing out an issue that I and others who have >tried the RPTR feel is an inexact end/start point. >I didn't create the language but I speak it well. I have to. Investing in >the RPTR and other gear over the years has shown me that I had better know >just how to use what I have, otherwise i'm a poor musician. That's just >how >I go about using instruments/tools. >To stop or start at any time, as the question asked, means (at least to my >addled brain) sans hiccup and has nothing to do with ambiance and more to >do >with honest advertising. Maybe you missed the hoopla on LD just prior to >and >after the RPTR came out, you can check the archives for that. >which reminds me why I had unsubscribed a little thereafter. >I have no issues with how anyone wishes to describe or answer a question >to >any one else but I do take exception if someone calls me "totally wrong" >about something. Mark, we can agree to disagree. I was answering a >question >from someone else in the most complete way possible, not exactly something >that you would get at a music store. Warts and all suck, this I know. But >if >someone is looking to spend some of their money, I had better tell them >what >my experience is in addition to pointing out when others have similar >issues. For all I know the original poster does not even care for >non-glitch >loops, but others may. Thus my answer. >Good to know people are reading posts still. >best regards, Pedro Felix - NYC 2002 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Marklar <sine@zerocrossing.net> >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com ><Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> >Date: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:58 PM >Subject: Re: RE:EDP or REPEATER? > > >>Uh Pedro, I think we're having a language thing here. The question >>asked >had absolutely nothing to do with whether you could get a >>seamless ambient loop, just whether or not you could start and stop >the >loop at any time. I will stand by my answer. >> >>Mark >> >>> >>> >>Subject: Re: RE:EDP or REPEATER? >>>>>>On the EDP or the Repeater is it possible to start and stop the loop >>at >>>>>any given time? >>>>> >>>>>On the EDP yes, on the RPTR no. >>>> >>>>you're totally wrong on that. You can stop and start the Repeater at > >>>will via it's front controls, or via MIDI. In fact, it constantly > >>>trips me up when I'm recording with my computer, and I do a take and > >press > >>play, and it restarts my loop. > >>> > >>Mark - >>>let's try this again. I own both units. The RPTR has a glitch when >recalling >>>a loop. I find it does not loop seamlessly as does the EDP. I would >suggest >>>that you check out previous posts on LD and the Electrix forum for more >info >>>on this problem that was not rectified with the new OS. Then again I >don't >>>need to convince you, as you seem happy looping with it now. So I say >>>coolness unto you, it just didn't work for me with the glitch. But I was >>>honesty answering the question and stand by my response as does >Electrix. >>>Just check here >http://www.electrixpro.com/UBB/ubb/Forum9/HTML/000131.html. >>> >>>now do your homework before you call me wrong. just kidding there. >>>best regards, Pedro Felix - NYC 2002 >>