Support |
> It's the most powerful hardware FX processor on the market today. [ :) I fear we trend on sacred ground here. At the danger of discussing religious issues, I'll continue carefully... ] I suppose it depends on what "most powerful hardware FX processor" means. Let's look at the Eventide Orville, the Symbolic Sound Kyma, and the Sony DRE-S777. In raw processor power, clearly a Kyma system is tops with 28 DSPs versus 2 on the Orville. On the other hand, the Eventide units can function standalone while Kyma requires an attached computer. And Eventide's pitch-shifting algorithms are highly optimized. The same pitch-shifting functions on Kyma consume more processor power, due somewhat to the more general architecture. Then there's the DRE-S777. It does reverb modelling based on near realtime convolution. This feat is unequaled by *any* other device that I know of. Perhaps that makes it "most powerful hardware FX processor"? Some ways, it's like discussing what's the most powerful fastest car or biggest truck,etc. While it's a interesting question, I'm not sure how useful it is. After all, the artist needs the tool that works best for him or her. If I really need a bicycle (perhaps a really good bicycle), the fastest car won't do at all. Dennis Leas ------------------- dennis@mdbs.com