Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

last search engine comment (i swear)



 i know i just ranted a bit about the search engine
comment, but right here, you just proved why i prefer
to ask the list as opposed to sifting through
thousands of useless and out of date web pages...

a clear conscise answer that provided more useful
information to me than 7 hours digging through
searched sites...thank you!


--- Richard Zvonar <zvonar@zvonar.com> wrote:
> At 10:22 AM -0700 4/11/02, Evan Meyers wrote:
> 
> >what would a setup like that go for these days?
> 
> If you mean how much it would cost to buy an older
> G4/500 and a Digi 
> 001 I suggest you check out used computer brokers
> such as Shreve 
> Systems for the Mac, and on-line music vendors such
> as audioMIDI.com 
> for the Digi stuff.
> 
> >what did it cost you when you initially set it up?
> 
> About the same as it would cost for a new system
> today, only the 
> computer would be faster.
> 
> >and if you were setting something up now (knowing
> what you know 
> >now), what would you go with as far as computer
> processing speed and 
> >stuff like that?
> 
> If I had the money I'd buy a dual 1.0GHz PowerMac.
> 
> >where would you look to get it?
> 
> Prices on new Macs don't vary that much. I usually
> buy from MacZone. 
> You can do comparison shopping at
> <http://www.pricewatch.com>
> 
> They list dual 1.GHz at $2899, MSRP is $2,999.
> 
> >and would you try to get a system custom built for
> just these needs 
> >or just get a regular G4?
> 
> With Macs the idea of "custom built" is less
> prevalent than for PCs. 
> You can order a custom Mac configuration from the
> Apple store, but a 
> stock system is fine. PCI card installation and RAM
> upgrades are 
> almost trivial and most software installation is
> totally 
> straightforward. However, if you DO want a
> pre-configured system you 
> can go to someone such as Wave Digital.
> 
> >  > The Digi 001 hardware is fine, as long as you
> don't
> >>  need to record at
> >>  a higher rate than 48kHz.
> >
> >why would one need to do this?
> 
> You probably wouldn't, but a lot of people are
> moving up to 96kHz to 
> achieve more high frequency reproduction. And even
> if they can't hear 
> it, many clients will insist on working in 96kHz
> because it's 
> state-of-the-art.
> 
> 
> >i read somewhere that the 2 front inputs are a bit
> hotter than the 
> >ones on the back or at least different in sampling
> rate or something 
> >like that.
> 
> Same sampling rate, but because they double as mic
> and line inputs 
> they do have adjustable gain.
> 
> >do you run an ADAT out of your setup or just work
> with the 
> >harddrives that you have?
> 
> I do all my work in the computer. I did one piece
> where I needed to 
> output to ADAT at the end, so I rented one for a
> day.
> 
> 
> >why don't you work with just the digi001 software?
> 
> The MIDI features are rudimentary. Digital Performer
> started as a 
> MIDI sequencer, so its MIDI functions are more
> highly developed.
> 
> 
> >i was under the impression that the digi001 has
> built in midi 
> >applications as well as some fx plugins
> 
> I haven't used the MIDI features. The plug-ins are
> OK, I guess. I 
> tend to use Waves and other plug-ins instead.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
>
______________________________________________________________
> Richard Zvonar, PhD
> (818) 788-2202
> http://www.zvonar.com
> http://RZCybernetics.com
> http://www.cybmotion.com/aliaszone
>
http://www.live365.com/cgi-bin/directory.cgi?autostart=rz
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/