Support |
--- Tom Heasley <tom@tomheasley.com> wrote: > At 02:17 PM 5/22/02, you wrote: > > > I use it mostly for pitch programs in tandem with a D-TWO and a > DL4. > > > I like it. > >Tom, > >If the MPX-1 does everything it claims, why would you also need the > >D-Two (and/or DL4)? More (varied) delays at the same time? > You do know that it is the G2, not the MPX1, that has a JamMan > program, > right? - not sure what you think the MPX1 claims to be able to do > that > would obviate the need for a DL4, EDP or other looper, with which to > do live multi-tracking. I wasn't questioning why you'd want something else for looping, that's obvious to me. It just seemed that the MPX-1 and D-2 were kind of redundant, which made me wonder if the MPX-1 had some inherent performance issues, or if you used the D-2 for something additional it offered. > I'd love nothing better than to only have to haul > around one piece of processing gear. That would be a dream. I guess some of the high end Eventide boxes are probably there, but are expensive and complex. > Hopefully some day in the not > too distant future, I can accomplish this with a laptop... That has a lot of potential, but presents a lot of different potential problems. Greg __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com