Re: Repeater vs EDP

["luca" <lucafeed@tin.it>]

I recently asked Lisa at Electrixpro if Repater has hardware limitations to
go to overdub from a 2nd hit of record (widely discussed but never clearly
replied).
she said that the current hardware would admit this feature, but she cannot
say when they'll be developing next sw release.
she said electrix "is very busy at the moment", could it be a good sign ?
hope so.
luca
------------------------------
www.unguitar.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Sottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: Repeater vs EDP


> Stuart Wyatt wrote:
>
> >
> > I think my point earlier was just due to my frustration that I might be
> > stuck permanently with OS1.1 - Its buggy, could have so many options,
> > more midi implementation etc. etc.
>
> Buggy?  I was one of the 1.1 beta testers, and I can pretty much say that
> there are very few bugs in the current Repeater OS.  My Repeater is very,
> very stable.  I think I got it to crash once, but I was doing something
> odd... I forget what...
>
> More MIDI implementation?  Seems pretty robust to me.  Is there a 
>function
> you can't control via MIDI?
>
> I do agree that the Repeater would be a more useful box if it could end a
> loop in overdub.  I hope Electrix lives to make that a feature in a 
>future
> OS.  While they're at it, I'd love to be able to pre determine a loop
> length in measures.  Have it automatically drop out of record after 4 or 
>8
> measures.  I hate having to think about closing the loop at the right 
>time
> when synched to a MIDI clock.
>
> Also, I'm again hearing about the delay of the dry signal pass through 
>the
> Repeater.  If there is a latency, it must be very tiny.  I can not hear
> it.  I've hooked it up to an effects send, where it should have been
> apparent, and did not notice any delay.  Does anyone else here this 
>delay?
>
> Mark
>