Support |
> According to the newest Electronic Musician magazine which has an article on > latency (for computer recording), AD or DA takes 1.5 ms. > . . . I'll have to read the article but this does not seems correct. For AD at a sampling frequency of 44.1 kHz, I'd expect a latency of 1 / 44100 or approx 22.7 microseconds. I.e., you'll get a new sample point every 22.7 microseconds. Now you could buffer up a bunch of sample points and output them later (producing latency), but they still being produced at a rate of 44,100 per second. Likewise for DA at 44.1 kHz. My guess is that the EM article is not discussing a pure AD then DA process. Dennis Leas ------------------- dennis@mdbs.com