Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
>Bruno, > >In a message dated 6/27/02 7:10:05 AM, brunoklein@ideastudioweb.com >writes: > ><snip> >>in effects looks like technical issues are much >>more interesting for the majority of us. ><snip> Hi Ted just wanted to underline that I am in the lurking mode for most of the time! Did you find me unpolite? in case I'm really sorry. But please let me understand why. I was just trying to get rid of my personal shiness (probably stronger then your since english is noy my language, can you imagine?) and sollicitate the not lurking people in the list (often very clever and sharp) to give some cues and share ideas. I know the techno discussion are *easier* and maybe they also respond to immediate or particular needs but I don't think that this dispense us to try and contemplate other issues... At the end what I called a structrural approach wasn't particulary philosophical in my mind... but something more simple like" when I loop I do these operations which correspond to this structure, for example, a bed of drones and a solo over (very simple ;-) or a bed of solos that at end become a big drone... I thought that a list of differents ways and ideas would have help me to be less predictable in my looping just this. best bruno PS: FWIW, OTOH... (pardon me... sometimes most of the loopfolk forget that this is an international list) >Hi there! > >FWIW, I (for one) wouldn't say that. However interesting I may >find a particular discussion, whether techno/gear-related or >muso/aesthetic-philosophical, I don't respond unless I have >something semi-substantial (in my own mind at least) to add. >In other words, if I don't have something fairly meaningful to >contribute . . . I keep my thoughts to myself pretty much. > >I think, perhaps, that a lot of other loopfolk on the list are the >same way. Many simply "lurk" a lot (like me) . . . just listening in >on the conversation . . . and responding with a comment when they >have one -- like me right now. Don't be too hard on us. We're just >shy and trying hard to be "polite." > >OTOH, it's much easier to respond to a post about an issue >surrounding some piece of gear with the usual "Yeah, I've had >that problem/bug too . . . or I tried one of those once and didn't >like it either . . . or what about that new gizmo . . . where did >you buy yours?" It's easier to put in one's "2 cents" and not >look like an idiot in those situations. > >I guess I don't mind looking like a idiot too much . . . because >it's pretty obvious by now that I am one. :-) So . . . without >further ado . . . it's back to lurk mode for me. > >Cheers, > >Ted Killian --