Re: looping tits on LD site??

["Jonathan El-Bizri" <ssrndpty@hotmail.com>]

Me either, but those ads are anything but. Still, if they are paying Kim,
I've got no problem with them.


----- Original Message -----
From: "jim palmer" <jimp@pobox.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: looping tits on LD site??


> what's wrong with being sexy?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Lehmann" <healthquestrecruiter@earthlink.net>
> > Hans does The Full Monty?
> > Gary
> > PS  I don't mind sexist ads as long as it keeps LD alive.
> > G
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Peters:
> > hi Kim,
> > not sure what kind of a site 'Bullz-eye.com' is and what a 'guys portal
to
> > the net' is good for but ... do we really need half-naked ladies ads on
the
> > LD site? I wouldn't object to ads that show half-naked loopers though
...
> > :-)
> >
> > = michael peters
> > = computer graphics + electronic music
> > = www.mpeters.de/mpeweb
> > = www.mp3.com/veloopity
> >
> >
>